Preview: meetings in Shapespark scenes

I welcome your every progress in this direction. Sellers of real estate or goods can more easily achieve their sales goals.

You can only form a price for this service on self-hosting projects. This service is also charged for other chat offers.

** updated
All my clients have requested the delivery of self hosting scenes.
Some will want to chat with their customers some will not.
My obligation should be chat integration.
However they should pay for your extra service. This should be independent of my account.

Hello Shapespark team,

I would like to add a suggestion on this topic. How about we could some how link this meeting features with multiple scenes ?

For example - I am touring an exterior scene and there are 3 people along with me, who are using this meeting feature. If one of the person wants to go inside and check out an interiors (which is a separate scene altogether) then, I think we wouldnā€™t have the continuity of seeing each other and talking, as the meeting link would be different for that scene.

I think this can be possible if we have audio streaming hosted separately somewhere which could even continue if the user switches between the scenes. Regarding Avatar, if we can somehow manage to link two scenes with the same Avatar name and colour, this idea sounds do able. Ofcourse I am saying this with very little knowledge of how things actually work in the backend, and hence need your views on it.

Please do let me know your thoughts.

For this use case it seems a reasonable approach would be to use a single scene as a meeting scene, and configure the links to sub-scenes to open these scenes in tabs. This way the user opening the scenes would stay present in the meeting and would be able to continue to participate in the discussion.

If you require meetings that are independent from scenes, you could use a separate conferencing application such as Google Meet or Zoom. This way users can be opening and closing the scenes and the meeting would continue.

Hi @jan , why after Iā€™m embed my shapespark meeting scene to my website and choose the audio, it show that aduio not require at the moment ? But Iā€™m using original shapespark meeting link it donā€™t have this problem, audio all look great.

Another thing is that I have testing the meeting link with my client, the audio system sound bad and my client canā€™t hear what Iā€™m talking. Does any solution ?

When embedding your meeting, could you adding allow="camera; microphone" parameters to the iframe configuration: javascript - accessing camera and mic in sandboxed iframe from different subdomain - Stack Overflow and see if it helps?

We plan to release the meetings in the Standard, Plus and Perpetual license tomorrow, the released version will use different audio/video settings, hopefully these settings will resolve your audio quality problems.

So starter plan will not have this meeting feature after tomorrow anymore ?

Feature is truly amazing !

One small request, please remove the word ā€œShapesparkā€ from the line " By joining, you agree to Shapespark [Terms of Service ] and [Privacy Policy ] as we content creators donā€™t want our competitors to know which software we are using and would want to whitelabel our brand over it.

Also, I wasnā€™t able to turn on video mode from my phone. Is it currently only supporting webcam and not phone cameras ?

Third point is that my web cam light remains ā€œLitā€ even when I have disabled Video call. This would make the user think that his webcam is still ON and people can see him (even when it wonā€™t). This isnā€™t the case with other meeting apps like Google Meet or Zoom.

Thanks

The video should be also supporting phone cameras. Did a browser show you a popup asking for permission to share your camera? If you accidentally permanently refuse this permission to a website, it is hard to revert this setting.

We will be fixing the camera indicator staying on when the video is no longer shared. This is caused by the fact that we keep the video stream open, without sending the video frames. This allows to quicker re-initialize the video sharing, but also has this effect of keeping the camera indicator on.

I think we can make the agreement line more generic as long as the lined privacy policy and terms of service clearly indicates who is responsible for handling the user data.

We have released the meetings: Video meetings are now available

Thank you to all of you who tested the features and provided feedback during the preview!